“We tend to think of censorship as aiming to destroy information that already exists. But when we observe the real behaviors of bodies like the Inquisition, they rarely attempt that—focusing instead on labeling or policing information, trying to control who accesses what, and on spreading fear of their authority. If we look at the condemnation of Galileo, it was only a “failure” if we presume the goal was to silence Galileo’s ideas. The condemnation also frightened Descartes into not publishing a newly-completed radical treatise, which he then revised heavily to be much more orthodox and Catholic. The condemnation “succeeded” in preventing the publication of Descartes’s ideas, and those of numerous others who decided to self-censor out of fear. This led to one of the project’s conclusions: the majority of censorship is self-censorship, but the majority of self-censorship is intentionally cultivated by a censoring authority.”

— Ada Palmer, on her project “Censorship and Information Control During Information Revolutions

inside you, young transmasculine person, is a voice that will tell you not to like certain things because they're For Girls. that is the voice of the devil, and you must never listen to it.

for those that need it:

inside you, young transfeminine person, is a voice that will tell you not to like certain things because they're Too Manly. that is the voice of the devil, and you must never listen to it.

anotha one from @notonepiece

image

remembering that time I explained on Twitter that Jews are 0.2% of the world’s population and control like 1.2% of its wealth

while Christians are 30-something percent of the world’s population and control 55% of its wealth

so, like, there IS a minority of the world’s population controlling the majority of its wealth

Christians.

and of course a bunch of utter walnuts were like “SEE??? this proves that Jews ARE disproportionately wealthy!!!”

which, like, sure

sure

we have $1.20 to Christians’ $55

but sure, individually we average out to having a bit more pocket change than the world’s average


a couple of things, though:

-those are AVERAGES—it doesn’t mean that every Jew you meet is wealthy, especially because…

-we are such a small population that the existence of *one Jewish billionaire* would skew the average, learn what an average is ffs, if there are 10 of us and 1 is a billionaire and the rest of us have $0 dollars, on average we each have $100,000,000 but in reality 9 of us still have $0 dollars

-y’all killed off a LOT of our poor people less than a century ago which also tends to skew the average


The minority group (in the sense of being less than half the population; they’re still the largest religion) controlling the majority of the world’s wealth is Christians. Sorry about your favorite conspiracy theory.

...inner battle continues

image

(and perona)

image

<<<


asker portrait
iluvnarcoticz23i8900b asked:

i think magellan would be a mandrill. also, kuma would be this:

image

extrashortshorts:

True…

image

🐻


asker portrait
chapelseed asked:

First: how does Catfish!Roger x ?!Rogue = Otter!Ace?

Second: what was Sabo and Dragon's forms?

Third: is Garp some kind of Dog Monkey?

extrashortshorts:

Garp would probably be a big dog, since his whole deal with ship and funny hat, also its easier to put a beard on the dog then on a monkey 🫱

image

Kiwi Rouge…better not to think logically about family trees. Its all based on associations and pure whim

image

Dragon IS a dragon, but he was too

BIG

And didn’t fit here

bird butt

image



no bird butt...

image

image

<<<🪶

Shame is gone, good vibes remain

Hawkeye remembered that almost everyone runs around without pants and he doesn't need to worry about his bird butt

image

*me on the phone to everyone I know to tell them Netflix took Sanji's eyebrows*

Newbern, Alabama is a small town. At it's heyday in the 1880s the population was 562. Today just about 150 people live there, with the population falling by 20% per decade for the past two decades.

It's a tiny town but there are residents who care about its future. One is Patrick Braxton, who started to question how the town was being run when working as a volunteer firefighter and during the early days of COVID.

The official leadership seemed unresponsive and even hostile. Newbern is majority black, but like many small towns in the Black Belt the town leadership is all white. Newbern has historically not had elections for Mayor--

Some residents from First Baptist Church of Newbern are fed up. Braxton among them. The small funds the Mayor controls are not spent with transparency. COVID supplies were squandered. When Patrick Braxton put up signs encouraging people to get vaccinated the signs were thrown in the burn heap.

So Braxton decided to run for mayor.

There is a process to have mayoral elections, Patrick Braxton found the paperwork despite obstruction from the city council. The existing mayor Haywood “Woody” Stokes III ignored him and didn't bother to run so Braxton won by default managing to get recognized by the county. Then, shortly after, the white town council met secretly and reappointed (??) Haywood “Woody” Stokes III as Mayor. It's an old typical situation. Here's the best article I found:

One other thing:

This kind of annoying headache inducing super local nit picky local politics is *the most important kind of political battle right now*

Power is built from these tiny councils up-- and the structures that keep all manner of "outsiders" from participating, or even knowing what they are doing need to be destroyed -- one little town at a time. Get the school board too.

If you live in a small town and don't know who the mayor is or what he does.

Maybe YOU should be the mayor.


One more note:

The man's name is Haywood “Woody” Stokes III

Haywood “Woody” Stokes III!

I mean...

ahh that fun feeling when you're watching a stream VOD and they're talking about something that's one of your nigh-hyperfixations and they're like "I just don't understand this, why do we do X?"

and you're just scraping grooves in your desk because you know but you can't tell them, because it's five months ago that they had this confusion. You can only pray that someone in the chat knows the answer, but so far, nope.

ARGH stream ended and no one explained.

OKAY so here are three questions that came up:

  1. Why do we milk cows?
  2. Why does lactose intolerance exist?
  3. Does human milk not have lactose?

In semi-random order:

Why does lactose intolerance exist?

It kinda dosen't! The more correct term is lactase persistence: Basically, most mammals have an enzyme called lactase that lets them digest lactose which goes away after weaning. This is because your body has to produce lactase to be able to digest lactose, the main sugar in milk. As most mammals don't drink milk after weening, they stop making lactase (or just greatly decrease how much they make) as they don't need it, and it wastes energy to make lactase when it's not useful.

Humans, because we have been drinking animal milk for a long while, have two gene variants that mean we keep making lactase after weaning. Interestingly, the majority of humans do not have these gene variants! Only like 35% of humans have lactase persistence.

The fact it seems so common to be able to drink milk and the fact we named the most common state for humans to be as "lactose intolerance" is because lactase persistence varies across ethnicities. Europeans have the highest percentage of lactase persistence, so lactase persistence is just "normal" and the majority of humans supposedly suffer from "lactose intolerance".

This is also a new mutation: Sometime in the last 10,000 years, with the variant of the gene must europeans have evolving something like 7,500 years ago. This is so recent that there are buildings still standing that predate this mutation.

There's a whole other rant here about theories on how lactase persistence evolved, but I can't go on forever.

Does human milk not have lactose?

The assumption from this is that humans have always been able to drink human milk, so it must not have lactose. Nah. Human milk is pretty similar to the milk of other mammals. The reason we (as in, babies) can drink human milk while being lactose intolerant (like how everyone was for most of human history) is not that there's anything special about human milk: it's that it's drank by babies. Humans (and most mammals) start out with plenty of lactase so they can digest milk, then they lose it later (unless they have lactase persistence as explained above)

BUT WHY COWS? WHY DO WE DRINK MILK FROM COWS?

Grass. It's grass.

Humans can't eat grass. Grass is hard to digest, and it has a bunch of silica in it that'll destroy your teeth. So we can't eat most grasses (we do eat a lot of grasses, though: corn, wheat, rice, and barley are all grasses).

But cows can eat clover and grasses we can't. And if we can milk a cow that's fed on clover & grass, we can then drink the milk. We're basically using a cow to turn inedible (to us) food into something we can digest.

Cows have very complex stomachs that are nothing like our own, because they need it to eat grasses. Instead of evolving our own stomachs like that, we domesticated the cow to have them eat the grass and turn it into milk, which we can consume. They're a biological conversion step in the factory that lets use eat grass.

So yeah. The ultimate answer to the starting question of "why do we milk cows?" is THEY EAT GRASS.

every day i follow Foone i learn cool stuff, USUALLY involving computers in some way

image

Then Jason never kills again.

1 2 3 4 5 Next